SCOTUSblog's list of petitions with a "reasonable" chance of being granted


Conference of 12/1

Name
Counsel of Record
Certiorari To
DN
Summary
Status
Grace v. Freedom from Religion Foundation  Paul Clement
SG of U.S.
CA7
06-157

Whether taxpayers have standing under Article III of the Constitution to challenge on Establishment Clause grounds the actions of Executive Branch officials pursuant to an Executive Order.


Granted
Catholic Healthcare West v. US ex rel. Haight Dale A. Danneman
Lewis & Roca
CA9
06-282

Whether documents obtained by a qui tam relator pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act constitute public disclosures within the meaning of the False Claims Act's jurisdictional bar.

Denied
Sawicki v. Morgan State Univ.   Eric Schnapper
Univ. of Washington
CA4
06-306

Whether, when an employee who is dismissed as the result of the intentionally discriminatory actions of an official who exerted substantial influence over the employment decision, the employer may avoid liability by showing that a different official was the ultimate decisionmaker.

Held
COSVI v. FAC     Alan Horowitz
Miller & Chevalier
CA1
06-458

Whether Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 enables a federal district court to manufacture jurisdiction to enforce a settlement by entering a new judgment months after it dismissed a lawsuit without retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.

Denied
Oneida Indian Nation of NY v. Peterman   Elizabeth Taylor
Zuckerman Spaeder
Ct. of App. of NY 06-470

Whether the rule adopted by the New York courts, that they may adjudicate an Indian tribe's interests in its federally approved gaming compact in the tribe's absence because the tribe could waive sovereign immunity and appear as a party in the suit, is preempted by federal law.

Denied
Center for Bio-Ethical Reform v. Honolulu Robert Muise
Thomas More Law Center                                  
CA9
06-479

Whether federal law preempts local ordinances prohibiting tow-banner aircraft operations approved by the Federal Aviation Administration, and whether a total ban on this form of expression violates the First Amendment.  This case is featured in "Conference Call" on 11/27.


Denied