Name |
Counsel
of Record |
Certiorari To |
DN |
Summary |
Status |
McGowan v. |
Samuel Halpern |
CA3 |
05-853 |
Whether a federal common law rule should be fashioned that requires a pension plan administrator to recognize a post-retirement waiver by petitioner's former spouse of her right to survivor annuity. (Link is to SG brief; petition coming soon) |
Denied |
David Frederick KHHTEF |
CA8 |
05-1284 |
Whether the
Federal Trade Commission's role in preventing deceptive advertising by
tobacco
companies is sufficient to establish that a tobacco company was "acting
under" a federal officer for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1442(a)(1), when the
tobacco company marketed cigarettes as "light." (SG brief here) |
Granted |
|
Appoloni
v. |
John West Bredhoff & Kaiser |
CA6 |
06-334 |
Whether early retirement payments
made to tenured
public school teachers, who gave up tenure and other rights upon
resigning from
their positions, were "wages" subject to Federal Insurance
Contributions Act taxes. |
Denied |
Saville
v. |
David J. Holdsworth Solo practitioner |
CA10 |
06-407 |
Whether
the concept of "materially adverse employment action," as applied in
claims
alleging discrimination or retaliation under federal workplace
legislation
containing protections against retaliation, covers such adverse
employment
actions as constructive discharges or forced early retirements.
(Petition coming soon) |
Denied |
PG&E v. |
Gene Schaerr Winston & Strawn |
CA9 |
06-466 |
Whether the
National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") requires a federal agency to
consider, as part of its NEPA review of an agency action, the
environmental
impact of potential sabotage of a nuclear plant whenever the
possibility of
sabotage is anything more than "remote and highly speculative."
|
Denied |
City of |
Gerald Moberg (616) Michael McFarland (626) |
CA9 |
06-616/ 06-626 |
Whether the police
officers involved in a search with the assistance of a police canine
dog are
entitled to qualified immunity when the dog unexpectedly bolts from the
handler's control and attacks an innocent bystander. (Note: this
case is featured in Legal Times on 1/8/07.)
|
Denied |
Christopher Landau Kirkland & Ellis |
CA6 |
06-705 |
Whether
a
bankruptcy court may not interpret a confirmed plan of reorganization
in a way
that would violate the Bankruptcy Code, thereby depriving such a plan
of
finality and allowing parties to challenge its legality at any time. (Bank
of NY BIO, Unsec.
Creditors BIO, Reply.
Thanks to Chris Landau at Kirkland for the docs.)
|
Held |