Skip to content

West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West Linn

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-299 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: (1) Whether the "essential nexus" and "rough proportionality" requirements of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) apply equally to the exactions of personal property as they do to exactions of real property; and (2) whether the court below misconstrued this Court"s decision in Lingle v. Chevron USA Inc. when it refused to apply the protection of the Fifth Amendment to an exaction of personal property.

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

[##CERT-STAGE##]