Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency
Petition for certiorari denied on October 15, 2013
Linked with:
- Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency
- American Chemistry Council v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Energy-Intensive Manufacturers Working Group on Greenhouse Gas Regulation v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Southeastern Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Texas v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Environmental Protection Agency
Issue: (1) Whether Virginia and other petitioners below demonstrated that there was evidence of central relevance to the EPA"s Endangerment Finding not available during the comment period such that the Administrator was obligated to convene a proceeding for reconsideration with procedural rights of notice and comment; (2) whether the EPA correctly applied the standard for demonstrating central relevance; (3) whether the EPA erred when it found the objections material enough to require resort to extensive new evidence outside of the record while denying the rights of notice and comment on that evidence; and (4) whether the EPA erred initially and on Petition for Reconsideration by delegating its Statutory Authority to outside entities.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Mary Pat Dwyer, September 26, 2013)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/20/2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2013) |
04/11/2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 22, 2013, for all respondents. |
05/08/2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for Texas, and eight other states. |
05/13/2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioners Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., et al. |
05/14/2013 | Consent to the filing of amicius curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the Federal Respondent. |
05/14/2013 | Letter of respondent National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Project in support of the petition received. |
05/15/2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 21, 2013, for all respondents. |
05/17/2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the State of Indiana. |
06/06/2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including July 22, 2013, for all respondents. . |
06/07/2013 | Application (12A1181) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
06/07/2013 | Application (12A1181) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits granted by The Chief Justice. The consolidated brief in opposition may not exceed 12,000 words. |
07/01/2013 | Application (13A35) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
07/08/2013 | Application (13A35) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits granted by The Chief Justice. The consolidated brief in opposition may not exceed 11,000 words. |
07/22/2013 | Brief of respondents Environmental Protection Agency in opposition filed. VIDED. |
07/22/2013 | Brief of Environmental Organization respondents in opposition filed. VIDED. |
07/22/2013 | Brief of respondents New York, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED. |
08/05/2013 | Reply of petitioners Virginia, et al. filed. |
08/07/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013. |
10/07/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 11, 2013. |
10/15/2013 | Petition DENIED. |