Skip to content

Van Buren v. United States

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-783 11th Cir. Nov 30, 2020 Jun 3, 2021 6-3 Barrett OT 2020

Holding: An individual "exceeds authorized access" under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. " 1030(a)(2), when he accesses a computer with authorization but then obtains information located in particular areas of the computer " such as files, folders or databases " that are off-limits to him.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Barrett on June 3, 2021. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito joined.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
12/18/2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)
01/07/2020Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Nathan Van Buren.
01/10/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2020 to February 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
01/13/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2020.
01/17/2020Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
01/17/2020Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.
01/31/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 18, 2020 to March 10, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
01/31/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 10, 2020.
03/10/2020Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
03/18/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
03/18/2020Reply of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.
04/13/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
04/20/2020Petition GRANTED.
04/29/2020Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
05/06/2020Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 1, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 27, 2020.
06/04/2020Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Nathan Van Buren
07/01/2020Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received 5/11/21).
07/01/2020Brief of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.
07/07/2020Brief amici curiae of The R Street Institute, et al. filed.
07/07/2020Brief amici curiae of Kyratso Karahalios, et al. filed.
07/07/2020Brief amicus curiae of Association of Medical Device Service Organizations filed.
07/07/2020Brief amicus curiae of Association of Medical Device Reprocessors filed.
07/08/2020Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
07/08/2020Brief amicus curiae of Committee for Justice filed.
07/08/2020Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.
07/08/2020Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed.
07/08/2020Brief amici curiae of National Whistleblower Center filed.
07/08/2020Brief amicus curiae of The United States Technology Policy Committee of the ACM in support of neither party filed.
07/08/2020Brief amici curiae of Technology Companies filed.
07/08/2020Brief amicus curiae of Orin S. Kerr filed.
07/08/2020Brief amici curiae of Computer Security Researchers, et al. filed.
07/08/2020Brief amicus curiae of The Markup filed.
08/27/2020Brief of respondent United States filed.
08/31/2020Brief amicus curiae of Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association filed.
09/01/2020Brief amicus curiae of Managed Funds Association filed.
09/02/2020Brief amici curiae of Karen Heart and Anthony Volini of CIPLIT filed.
09/03/2020Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed.
09/03/2020Brief amicus curiae of Voatz, Inc. filed.
09/03/2020Brief amicus curiae of Digital Justice Foundation filed.
09/16/2020SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 30, 2020.
09/28/2020Reply of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.
10/08/2020Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit.
10/13/2020Record received from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
10/27/2020CIRCULATED
11/04/2020Record received from the U.S.D.C Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) Some sealed materials. One Envelope.
11/30/2020Argued. For petitioner: Jeffrey L. Fisher, Stanford, Cal. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
06/03/2021Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Barrett, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-783_k53l.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito, J., joined.
07/06/2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.
02/15/2023Record returned to the U.S.D.C Northern District of Georgia (three envelopes).