Skip to content

United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-46 May 4, 2020 Jun 30, 2020 8-1 Ginsburg OT 2019

Holding: A term styled "generic.com" is a generic name for a class of goods or services"and thus ineligible for federal trademark protection"only if the term has that meaning to consumers.

Judgment: Affirmed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 30, 2020. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/05/2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 7, 2019)
08/07/2019Brief of respondent Booking.com B.V. in opposition filed.
08/21/2019Reply of petitioners United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. filed.
10/09/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
11/04/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
11/08/2019Petition GRANTED.
12/09/2019Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
12/10/2019Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 6, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including February 12, 2020.
01/06/2020Joint appendix filed.
01/06/2020Brief of petitioners United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. filed.
01/13/2020Brief amici curiae of Trademark Scholars in support of neither party filed.
01/13/2020Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
01/13/2020Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed.
01/31/2020SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 23, 2020.
02/12/2020Brief of respondent Booking.com B.V. filed.
02/19/2020Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.
02/19/2020CIRCULATED
02/19/2020Brief amici curiae of Trademark and Internet Law Professors filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amici curiae of Salesforce.com, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amici curiae of Survey Scholars and Consultants filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of The International Trademark Association filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of The Association of Amicus Counsel filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amici curiae of Professor Peter N. Golder, Ph.D., and other Marketing Academics filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of Internet Commerce Association filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of Boston Patent Law Association filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association filed. (Distributed)
02/19/2020Brief amicus curiae of Coalition of .Com Brand Owners filed. (Distributed)
02/20/2020The record is located on PACER. Sealed record material from the USCA 4th Circuit electronically received.
03/13/2020Reply of petitioners United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/16/2020ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED.
04/13/2020Argument to be rescheduled for May 2020.
04/15/2020RESCHEDULED FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, May 4, 2020.
05/04/2020Argued. For petitioners: Erica L. Ross, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C.
06/30/2020Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-46_8n59.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
08/03/2020JUDGMENT ISSUED.