Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Gregg
Petition for certiorari denied on June 17, 2024
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23-645 | Cal. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2023 |
Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires the complete severance of arbitrable individual claims under the California Private Attorneys General Act from non-individual claims, with the individual claims committed to a separate proceeding.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Rideshare companies ask justices to reexamine California worker-protection law (Kalvis Golde, April 10, 2024)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
12/12/2023 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024) |
12/21/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 16, 2024 to February 15, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
12/22/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 15, 2024. |
01/15/2024 | Brief amicus curiae of Civil Justice Association of California filed. |
01/16/2024 | Brief amicus curiae of California Business & Industrial Alliance filed. |
01/16/2024 | Brief amicus curiae of Employers Group filed. |
01/16/2024 | Brief amicus curiae of Restaurant Law Center filed. |
02/14/2024 | Brief of respondent Johnathon Gregg in opposition filed. |
02/27/2024 | Reply of petitioners Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
02/28/2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024. |
03/12/2024 | Rescheduled. |
05/28/2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024. |
06/17/2024 | Petition DENIED. |