U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services v. City and County of San Francisco, California
Petition for certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 46, on March 9, 2021
Issue: (1) Whether entities that are not subject to the public-charge ground of inadmissibility contained in 8 U.S.C. " 1182(a)(4)(A), and which seek to expand benefits usage by aliens who are potentially subject to that provision, are proper parties to challenge the final rule that an alien is "inadmissible" if, "in the opinion of the [Secretary of Homeland Security] at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, [the alien] is likely at any time to become a public charge"; and (2) whether the final rule is likely contrary to law or arbitrary and capricious.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Cases testing Trumps public charge immigration rule are dismissed (Amy Howe, March 9, 2021)
- The men-only draft and compelled iPhone passcodes (Andrew Hamm, January 29, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
01/21/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2021) |
02/02/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 22, 2021 to March 24, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
02/03/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 24, 2021, for all respondents. |
03/09/2021 | Joint stipulation to dismiss the case pursuant Rule 46.1 filed. |
03/09/2021 | Petition Dismissed - Rule 46. |