U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-1285 | 3d Cir. | Nov 27, 2012 | Apr 16, 2013 | 5-4 | Kagan | OT 2012 |
Holding: In an action brought under Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which authorizes a civil action "to obtain . . . appropriate equitable relief . . . to enforce . . . the terms of the" ERISA plan, based on an equitable lien by agreement, the terms of the ERISA plan govern. However, when there are gaps in the plan, equitable doctrines may be used to properly construe it.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded on April 16, 2013. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: If the agreement governs, the agreement governs (Kevin Amer, April 19, 2013)
- Argument recap: What would Lord Coke do? (Kevin Amer, November 30, 2012)
- Argument preview: What is appropriate equitable relief under ERISA? (Kevin Amer, November 26, 2012)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/14/2012 | Application (11A879) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2012 to May 23, 2012, submitted to Justice Alito. |
03/16/2012 | Response to application from respondents James E. McCutchen, et al. filed. |
03/17/2012 | Application (11A879) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until May 3, 2012. |
04/25/2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 25, 2012) |
05/08/2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 5, 2012. |
05/25/2012 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Subrogation Professionals, et al. filed. |
06/05/2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 21, 2012. |
06/05/2012 | Brief of respondents James E. McCutchen, et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed) |
06/08/2012 | Reply of petitioner US Airways, Inc., in its Capacity as Fiduciary and Plan Administrator of the US Airways, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan filed. (Distributed) |
06/12/2012 | Letter of June 7, 2012, from counsel for respondents received. (Distributed) |
06/20/2012 | Letter of June 20, 2012, from counsel for petitioner received. (Distributed) |
06/20/2012 | Letter of June 20, 2012, from counsel for respondents received. (Distributed) |
06/25/2012 | Petition GRANTED. |
07/26/2012 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 29, 2012. |
07/26/2012 | The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 18, 2012. |
08/15/2012 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner, and counsel for the respondents. |
08/29/2012 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received.) |
08/29/2012 | Brief of petitioner US Airways, Inc., in its Capacity as Fiduciary and Plan Administrator of the US Airways, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan filed. |
09/05/2012 | Brief amicus curiae of the United States in support of neither party filed. |
09/05/2012 | Brief amici curiae of Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, et al. filed. |
09/05/2012 | Brief amicus curiae of National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans filed. |
09/05/2012 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Subrogation Professionals, et al. filed. |
09/05/2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund filed. |
09/05/2012 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
09/14/2012 | SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, November 27, 2012. |
09/14/2012 | CIRCULATED |
10/04/2012 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. for the Third Circuit is electronic. And the record from the U.S.D.C. for Western District of Pennsylvania is included in this record. |
10/18/2012 | Brief of respondents James E. McCutchen, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/18/2012 | Brief amici curiae of Pennsylvania Association for Justice filed. (Distributed) |
10/25/2012 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. |
10/25/2012 | Brief amici curiae of United Policyholders, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/25/2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Consumer Watchdog filed. (Distributed) |
10/25/2012 | Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed. (Distributed) |
10/25/2012 | Brief amici curiae of AARP, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/25/2012 | Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. (Distributed) |
10/25/2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Michigan Association for Justice filed. (Distributed) |
11/13/2012 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. |
11/13/2012 | Reply of petitioner US Airways, Inc., in its Capacity as Fiduciary and Plan Administrator of the US Airways, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan filed. (Distributed) |
11/19/2012 | Letter proposing a lodging of the U.S. Airways, Inc. Health Benefit Plan ("Plan") received from counsel for respondents. (Distributed) |
11/26/2012 | LODGING received from counsel for the respondents. (Distributed) |
11/27/2012 | Argued. For petitioner: Neal Kumar Katyal, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae: Joseph R. Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Matthew W. H. Wessler, Washington, D. C. |
04/16/2013 | Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. |
05/20/2013 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
Holding: In an action brought under Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which authorizes a civil action “to obtain . . . appropriate equitable relief . . . to enforce . . . the terms of the” ERISA plan, based on an equitable lien by agreement, the terms of the ERISA plan govern. However, when there are gaps in the plan, equitable doctrines may be used to properly construe it.
Judgment:”Vacated and remanded“on April 16, 2013. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito joined.