Trump v. Karnoski
Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment denied on January 22, 2019
Linked with:
Issue: Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing nationwide the 2018 policy of Secretary of Defense James Mattis under which transgender individuals would be permitted to serve in the military, while individuals with a history of a medical condition called gender dysphoria would be disqualified from military service unless they meet certain conditions.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Justices to review New York gun rights case (Amy Howe, January 22, 2019)
- Government returns to Supreme Court on military transgender ban (Amy Howe, December 13, 2018)
- Government asks justices to intervene in dispute over transgender service members (Amy Howe, November 24, 2018)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
11/23/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 24, 2018) |
12/13/2018 | Response to application (18A625) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, December 28, 2018, by noon ET. |
12/13/2018 | Application (18A625) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
12/19/2018 | Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed.VIDED |
12/21/2018 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Foundation for Moral Law. (Distributed) |
12/24/2018 | Brief of Egeler, Anne Elizabeth State of Washington in opposition filed. (Distributed) |
12/26/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019. |
12/26/2018 | Brief of respondents Ryan Karnoski, et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed) |
12/28/2018 | Joint response to application from respondents filed. |
01/04/2019 | Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed) |
01/04/2019 | Letter of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed) |
01/04/2019 | Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. |
01/09/2019 | Response to Petitioner's January 4, 2019 Letter of Ryan Karnoski, et al. not accepted for filing. (January 10, 2019 -To be re-submitted as a supplemental brief in compliance with Rule 33.1) |
01/09/2019 | Supplemental brief of respondents Ryan Karnoski, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
01/14/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019. |
01/22/2019 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Foundation for Moral Law GRANTED. |
01/22/2019 | Application (18A625) referred to the Court. |
01/22/2019 | Petition DENIED. |
01/22/2019 | Application (18A625) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court’s December 11, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would deny the application. |