Taylor v. United States
Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya on May 14, 2018.
Issue: Whether a certificate of appealability should be granted to resolve a circuit split regarding whether the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. ยง 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 05/01/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2017) |
| 05/10/2017 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
| 05/17/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 1, 2017. |
| 05/30/2017 | Response Requested. (Due June 29, 2017) |
| 06/21/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 31, 2017. |
| 07/31/2017 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| 08/02/2017 | Reply of petitioner Brandon D.Taylor filed. |
| 08/10/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017. |
| 04/17/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/20/2018. |
| 04/23/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018. |
| 05/07/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018. |
| 05/14/2018 | Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U. S. ____ (2018). |
| 06/15/2018 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |