Rowell v. Pettijohn
Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman.
Issue: Whether state no-surcharge laws unconstitutionally restrict speech conveying price information (as the Eleventh Circuit has held), or regulate only economic conduct (as the Second and Fifth Circuits have held).
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the day (Kate Howard, July 2, 2016)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
05/31/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2016) |
07/05/2016 | Brief of respondent Leslie L. Pettijohn, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner in opposition filed. |
07/20/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
07/25/2016 | Reply of petitioners Lynn Rowell, dba Beaumont Greenery, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
08/12/2016 | Rescheduled. |
08/17/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
03/29/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017. |
04/03/2017 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 581 U. S. ___ (2017). |
05/05/2017 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |