Skip to content

Rowell v. Pettijohn

Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman.

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-1455 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2016

Issue: Whether state no-surcharge laws unconstitutionally restrict speech conveying price information (as the Eleventh Circuit has held), or regulate only economic conduct (as the Second and Fifth Circuits have held).

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/31/2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2016)
07/05/2016Brief of respondent Leslie L. Pettijohn, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner in opposition filed.
07/20/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
07/25/2016Reply of petitioners Lynn Rowell, dba Beaumont Greenery, et al. filed. (Distributed)
08/12/2016Rescheduled.
08/17/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
03/29/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017.
04/03/2017Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 581 U. S. ___ (2017).
05/05/2017JUDGMENT ISSUED.