Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monica, California

Petition for certiorari denied on May 18, 2020

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
19-1081	9th Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2019

Issue: (1) Whether a local ordinance that discriminates against interstate commerce, and was enacted for a discriminatory purpose, must additionally discriminate exclusively against nonresidents to be subject to heightened scrutiny under the dormant commerce clause; and (2) whether a local ordinance that purports to ban advertisements for interstate services made over the internet, and is enforced in that extraterritorial manner, can be saved from dormant commerce clause scrutiny based on an irrebuttable "presumption" that the legislature did not "intend" for the ordinance to apply in the extraterritorial manner in which the ordinance is being enforced.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, April 8, 2020)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/02/2020	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)
04/02/2020	Brief of respondents The City of Santa Monica, et al. in opposition filed.
04/16/2020	Reply of petitioner Arlene Rosenblatt filed.
04/22/2020	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
05/18/2020	Petition DENIED.