Skip to content

Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-938 Nov 13, 2019 Jan 14, 2020 9-0 Ginsburg OT 2019

Holding: A bankruptcy court"s order unreservedly denying relief from the automatic stay constitutes a final, immediately appealable order under 28 U.S.C. " 158(a).

Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 14, 2020.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
01/14/2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)
03/06/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
03/13/2019Response Requested. (Due April 12, 2019)
04/12/2019Brief of respondent Jackson Masonry, LLC in opposition filed.
04/17/2019Reply of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed.
04/18/2019Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed.
04/23/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
05/13/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
05/20/2019Petition GRANTED.
06/09/2019Motion of petitioner for an extension of time filed.
06/26/2019Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2019.
07/08/2019SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 13, 2019.
08/05/2019Brief of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (Corrected brief submitted).
08/05/2019Brief of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (October 4, 2019). (Distributed)
08/05/2019Joint appendix filed.
08/23/2019Motion for an extension of time to file respondents' brief on the merits filed.
08/29/2019Motion to extend the time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including October 4, 2019.
09/03/2019CIRCULATED
09/16/2019Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.
09/18/2019Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.
10/04/2019Brief of respondent Jackson Masonry, LLC filed. (Distributed)
10/11/2019Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
10/11/2019Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
10/11/2019Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys filed. (Distributed)
10/21/2019Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
10/21/2019Proposal of respondent to lodge copies of documents in related cases cited in respondent's brief on the merits filed.
11/04/2019Reply of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
11/13/2019Argued. For petitioner: James K. Lehman, Columbia, S. C. For respondent: Griffin S. Dunham, Nashville, Tenn.; and Vivek Suri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
01/14/2020Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
02/18/2020JUDGMENT ISSUED.