Resurrection School v. Hertel
Petition for certiorari denied on October 31, 2022
Issue: (1) Whether under the voluntary cessation exception to mootness a government must satisfy the "absolutely clear" standard and, if not, to what extent the government should be treated differently from private defendants; (2) whether the government is owed a presumption of good faith under the voluntary cessation exception to mootness when it retains the authority and interest to re-impose its challenged policy; and (3) whether a claim is capable of repetition yet evading review when the government retains the authority to re-issue a restriction that imposes the same harm in the same way.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Second chance to evaluate ban on encouraging unlawful immigration (Kalvis Golde, September 16, 2022)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/23/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2022) |
09/08/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Dana Nessel, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan to respond filed. |
09/13/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to respond filed. |
09/26/2022 | Waiver of right of respondents Linda Vail, Ingham County Health Officer; and Carol A. Siemon, Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney to respond filed. |
09/28/2022 | Brief amici curiae of California Rental Housing Association, et al. filed. |
10/12/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022. |
10/31/2022 | Petition DENIED. |