Skip to content

Rapelje v. McClellan

Petition for certiorari denied on November 18, 2013

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-1480 6th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2013

Issue: (1) Whether a state-court order denying a request for relief on a constitutional claim "for lack of merit in the grounds presented" constitutes a merits adjudication of that claim for purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA); and (2) whether a federal habeas court may, consistent with AEDPA, delve into the internal procedures of a state court to support its speculation that an order denying relief "for lack of merit" is not, in fact, a merits adjudication.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
06/19/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 22, 2013)
07/15/2013Brief of respondent Tyrik McClellan in opposition filed.
07/15/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Tyrik McClellan.
07/31/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.
08/27/2013Reply of petitioner Lloyd Rapelje filed. (Distributed).
10/07/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 11, 2013.
10/15/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 18, 2013.
10/28/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 1, 2013.
11/04/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 8, 2013.
11/12/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 15, 2013.
11/18/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
11/18/2013Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Scalia joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.(Detached Opinion)