Skip to content

Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-1315 9th Cir. Jan 21, 2014 May 19, 2014 6-3 Ginsburg OT 2013

Holding: In a case by the owner of a screenplay alleging copyright infringement, the doctrine of laches cannot be invoked as a bar to the pursuit of a claim for damages brought within the three-year window established by Section 507(b) of the Copyright Act. However, in extraordinary circumstances, laches may, at the very outset of the litigation, curtail the relief equitably awarded.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on May 19, 2014. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy joined.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/30/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2013)
05/16/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 2, 2013.
06/03/2013Brief amicus curiae of Califorina Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed.
08/02/2013Brief of respondents Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
08/20/2013Reply of petitioner Paula Petrella filed. (Distributed)
08/21/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.
10/01/2013Petition GRANTED.
10/04/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
10/09/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
11/04/2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 21, 2014.
11/15/2013Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
11/15/2013Brief of petitioner Paula Petrella filed.
11/19/2013Record from the U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. There are SEALED documents in this record.
11/20/2013Brief amici curiae of Southwestern Law Students Orly Ravid, and Andrew Pruitt, and Profesors Robert C. Lind and Michael M. Epstein filed. (Distributed)
11/21/2013CIRCULATED.
11/21/2013Brief amicus curiae of California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed. (Distributed)
11/21/2013Brief amici curiae of Professor Robin Feldman, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/21/2013Record received from the U.S.D.C. for the Central District of California (Western District - LA) is electronic and located on PACER. Also received are SEALED documents in this record, which consist of Volume 1 - Volume 6. (1 box)
11/22/2013Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of Authors Guild, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of Douglas Laycock, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amicus curiae of Ralph Oman, Former Register of Copyrights of the United States filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
12/06/2013Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
12/16/2013Brief of respondents Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2013Brief amicus curiae of Association for Competitive Technology filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2013Brief amici curiae of Dish Network L.L.C., et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2013Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2013Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2013Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2013Brief amicus curiae of T. Leigh Anenson filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2013Brief amici curiae of The Motion Picture Association of America, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/03/2014Reply of petitioner Paula Petrella filed. (Distributed)
01/10/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
01/21/2014Argued. For petitioner: Stephanos Bibas, Philadelphia, Pa.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondents: Mark A. Perry, Washington, D. C.
05/19/2014Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, J., joined.
06/20/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED.
06/24/2014Record for U.S.D.C. Central District of California (Western Division) has been returned.

Issue: Whether the nonstatutory defense of laches is available without restriction to bar all remedies for civil copyright claims filed within the three-year statute of limitations prescribed by Congress, 17 U.S.C. § 507(b).