PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc.
| Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17-1705 | Mar 25, 2019 | Jun 20, 2019 | 9-0 | Breyer | OT 2018 |
Holding: The extent to which a 2006 Federal Communications Commission order interpreting the term "unsolicited advertisement" binds lower courts may depend on the resolution of two preliminary questions that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit should address in the first instance: (1) whether the order is the equivalent of a legislative rule, which has the force and effect of law, or an interpretative rule, which does not; and (2) whether PDR Network, LLC had a "prior" and "adequate" opportunity to seek judicial review of the order.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on June 20, 2019. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Gorsuch joined. Justice Kavanaugh filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: Court dodges question (for now) whether the Hobbs Act is ordinary or extraordinary administrative law (Christopher Walker, June 21, 2019)
- A "view" from the courtroom: "Quite prolific in our writing" (Mark Walsh, June 20, 2019)
- Argument analysis: Justices struggle with whether the Hobbs Act is ordinary or extraordinary administrative law (Christopher Walker, March 26, 2019)
- A view from the courtroom: From the Federal Register to the Stanley Cup (Mark Walsh, March 25, 2019)
- Argument preview: The Hobbs Act as ordinary or extraordinary administrative law (Christopher Walker, March 18, 2019)
- OT2018 #8: "Animal Magnetism" (First Mondays, November 19, 2018)
- Court adds two new cases to merits docket (Amy Howe, November 13, 2018)
- Petitions of the week (Aurora Barnes, August 23, 2018)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 06/21/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 26, 2018) |
| 07/11/2018 | Waiver of right of respondent Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. to respond filed. |
| 07/18/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
| 08/01/2018 | Response Requested. (Due August 31, 2018) |
| 08/29/2018 | Brief of respondent Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. in opposition filed. |
| 09/11/2018 | Reply of petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 09/12/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018. |
| 10/09/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018. |
| 10/22/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018. |
| 10/29/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018. |
| 11/05/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018. |
| 11/13/2018 | Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. |
| 11/27/2018 | Motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits filed. |
| 11/28/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including January 8, 2019. |
| 01/08/2019 | Brief of petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al. filed. |
| 01/09/2019 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al. |
| 01/15/2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Aditya Bamzai filed. |
| 01/15/2019 | Brief amici curiae of State and Local Government Associations filed. |
| 01/15/2019 | Brief amici curiae of State of Oklahoma, et al. filed. |
| 01/15/2019 | Brief amicus curiae of U.S. Chamber of Commerce in support of neither party filed. |
| 01/22/2019 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED. |
| 01/25/2019 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 25, 2019 |
| 02/07/2019 | Brief of respondent Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. filed. |
| 02/14/2019 | CIRCULATED |
| 02/14/2019 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/14/2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/14/2019 | Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/14/2019 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. |
| 02/15/2019 | Corrected Certificate of Compliance from the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed. (2/19/2019) |
| 02/21/2019 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit. |
| 03/04/2019 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. |
| 03/11/2019 | Reply of petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 03/25/2019 | Argued. For petitioners: Carter G. Phillips, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Glenn L. Hara, Rolling Meadows, Ill.; and Rachel P. Kovner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) |
| 06/20/2019 | Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Gorsuch, J., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. |
| 07/22/2019 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |