North Carolina Department of Revenue v. The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-457 | Apr 16, 2019 | Jun 21, 2019 | 9-0 | Sotomayor | OT 2018 |
Holding: The presence of in-state beneficiaries alone does not empower a state to tax trust income that has not been distributed to the beneficiaries where the beneficiaries have no right to demand that income and are uncertain to receive it.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on June 21, 2019. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: Presence of in-state beneficiaries alone insufficient for state to assert jurisdiction to tax trust income (Erin Scharff, June 22, 2019)
- A "view" from the courtroom: "We break no new legal ground" (Mark Walsh, June 21, 2019)
- Argument analysis: Court worries that state trust tax may tax trust income that is never distributed to in-state beneficiary (Erin Scharff, April 18, 2019)
- Argument preview: Justices consider whether beneficiarys residence is sufficient for state to assert tax jurisdiction over trust income (Erin Scharff, April 10, 2019)
- OT2018 #15: "Second Best Opinion" (First Mondays, January 21, 2019)
- Eight new grants, Ginsburg recovery from surgery on track (Amy Howe, January 11, 2019)
- Petitions of the week (Aurora Barnes, November 8, 2018)