Skip to content

Musacchio v. United States

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-1095 5th Cir. Nov 30, 2015 Apr 23, 2025 9-0 Thomas OT 2015

Holding: 1) When a jury instruction adds an element to the charged crime and the government fails to object, a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence should be assessed against the elements of the charged crime, rather than the elements set forth in the erroneous jury instruction; and (2) a defendant cannot successfully raise a statute-of-limitations bar for the first time on appeal.

Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 23, 2025.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/09/2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2015)
04/02/2015Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 11, 2015.
04/30/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 26, 2015.
05/22/2015Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
06/02/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 18, 2015.
06/02/2015Reply of petitioner Michael Musacchio filed. (Distributed)
06/22/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015.
06/29/2015Petition GRANTED.
07/07/2015The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 28, 2015.
07/07/2015The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 13, 2015.
08/28/2015Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
08/28/2015Brief of petitioner Michael Musacchio filed.
10/09/2015SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 30, 2015
10/13/2015Brief of respondent United States filed.
10/19/2015Record requested from U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.
10/27/2015CIRCULATED
11/12/2015Reply of petitioner Michael Musacchio filed. (Distributed)
11/30/2015Argued. For petitioner: Erik S. Jaffe, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Roman Martinez, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
01/25/2016Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
02/26/2016Judgment Issued