Miles v. California
Petition for certiorari denied on March 22, 2021
Issue: (1) Whether a court reviewing a claim under Batson v. Kentucky may consider reasons distinguishing stricken jurors from those accepted by the prosecutor when the prosecutor did not cite the distinguishing reason in the trial court as a basis for the strike; and (2) whether, for purposes of comparative juror analysis, the jurors being compared must have expressed the same combination of responses in all material respects for the comparison to have significant probative value.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Two cases on the state-secrets privilege (Andrew Hamm, January 22, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
12/10/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2021) |
12/16/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2021 to February 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
12/17/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 16, 2021. |
01/14/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Former State and Federal Court Judges filed. |
02/16/2021 | Brief of respondent California in opposition filed. |
03/02/2021 | Reply of petitioner Johnny Duane Miles filed. (Distributed) |
03/03/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. |
03/22/2021 | Petition DENIED. |