Skip to content

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-290 Jan 7, 2019 May 20, 2019 9-0 Breyer OT 2018

Holding: "Clear evidence" that the Food and Drug Administration would not have approved a change to a drug"s label " thus pre-empting a state-law failure-to-warn claim " is evidence showing that the drug manufacturer fully informed the FDA of the justifications for the warning required by state law and that the FDA, in turn, informed the drug manufacturer that the FDA would not approve a change to the drug"s label to include that warning; the question of agency disapproval is primarily one of law for a judge to decide.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on May 20, 2019. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh joined.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
06/23/2017Application (16A1264) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 23, 2017 to August 22, 2017, submitted to Justice Alito.
06/27/2017Application (16A1264) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 22, 2017.
08/22/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 25, 2017)
08/31/2017Waiver of right of respondents Affronti, Joanne, et al. to respond filed.
09/11/2017Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. on 09/12/2017
09/19/2017Waiver of right of respondents Esther Parker & Pamela Paralikis to respond filed.
09/20/2017Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Albrecht, Doris, et al. on 09/21/2017
09/21/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 25, 2017, for all respondents.
09/22/2017Because Justice Alito now realizes that he should have recused himself from consideration of this application, the order of June 27, 2017, is vacated. Pursuant to Rule 22.2, the application (16A1264) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 23, 2017 to August 22, 2017, has been submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
09/22/2017Application (16A1264) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until August 22, 2017. (Justice Alito is recused)
09/25/2017Brief amicus curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed.
09/25/2017Brief amici curiae of Product Liability Adisory Council, Inc., et al. filed.
10/25/2017Brief of respondents Doris Albrecht, et al. in opposition filed.
11/08/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017.
11/08/2017Reply of petitioner Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed. (Distributed)
12/04/2017The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
05/22/2018Brief amicus curiae of United States filed (to be corrected and reprinted).
05/22/2018Brief amicus curiae of United States filed (Corrected brief received 5/29/18).
06/05/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.
06/05/2018Supplemental brief of respondents Doris Albrecht, et al. filed. (Distributed)
06/07/2018Supplemental brief of petitioner Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed. (Distributed)
06/27/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2018.
06/28/2018Petition GRANTED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
07/27/2018Motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits filed.
07/27/2018Motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 13, 2018. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including November 14, 2018.
09/12/2018Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Doris Albrecht, et al..
09/13/2018Joint appendix (2 volumes) filed. (Statement of costs filed)
09/13/2018Brief of petitioner Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed.
09/17/2018Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp..
09/20/2018Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
09/20/2018Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
09/20/2018Brief amici curiae of Product Liability Adisory Council, Inc., et al. filed.
09/20/2018Brief amici curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, et al. filed.
10/12/2018Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
10/26/2018Justice Alito is no longer recused in this case.
11/14/2018Brief of respondents Doris Albrecht, et al. filed.
11/21/2018Brief amici curiae of Tort Law Professors John C. P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky filed.
11/21/2018Brief amici curiae of MedShadow Foundation, et al. filed.
11/21/2018Brief amici curiae of Public Law Scholars filed.
11/21/2018Brief amici curiae of Commonwealth of Virginia, et al. filed.
11/21/2018Brief amici curiae of Joseph Lane, M.D., and Vincent Vigorita, M.D. filed.
11/21/2018Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
11/21/2018Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen filed.
11/21/2018Brief amici curiae of Jerome P. Kassirer, M.D., et al. filed.
11/21/2018Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed.
11/28/2018SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, January 7, 2019
11/30/2018CIRCULATED
12/03/2018Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
12/11/2018Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit.
12/14/2018Reply of petitioner Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed. (Distributed)
12/18/2018Record received from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit is electronic.
12/18/2018Record from the U.S.D.C. District of New Jersey is electronic and located on PACER.
01/07/2019Argued. For petitioner: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C.; and Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.
05/20/2019Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Thomas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kavanaugh, J., joined.
06/21/2019JUDGMENT ISSUED.