Skip to content

McCullen v. Coakley

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-1168 1st Cir. Jan 15, 2014 Jun 26, 2014 9-0 Roberts OT 2013

Holding: A Massachusetts law which makes it a crime to stand on a public road or sidewalk within thirty-five feet of a reproductive health care facility violates the First Amendment.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 26, 2014. Justice Scalia filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Kennedy and Thomas joined. Justice Alito also filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/25/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 25, 2013)
04/24/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 24, 2013.
04/24/2013Brief amici curiae of Richard W. Garnett, et al. filed.
04/24/2013Brief amici curiae of Life Legal Defense Foundation, and Walter B. Hoye II filed.
04/24/2013Brief amici curiae of Molly White, et al. filed.
05/24/2013Brief of respondents Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al. in opposition filed.
06/04/2013Reply of petitioners Eleanor McCullen, et al. filed.
06/04/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.
06/24/2013Petition GRANTED.
07/10/2013The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 9, 2013.
07/10/2013The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including November 7, 2013.
09/09/2013Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
09/09/2013Brief of petitioners Eleanor McCullen, et al. filed.
09/13/2013Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.
09/13/2013Brief amici curiae of Democrats for Life of America and Clergy for Better Choices filed.
09/13/2013Brief amicus curiae of Justice and Freedom Fund filed.
09/13/2013Brief amicus curiae of 12 Women Who Attest to the Importance of Free Speech in Their Abortion Decisions filed.
09/13/2013Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.
09/16/2013Brief amici curiae of Life Legal Defense Foundation and Walter B. Hoye II filed.
09/16/2013Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Counsel filed.
09/16/2013Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed.
09/16/2013Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
09/16/2013Brief amici curiae of Michigan and 11 Other States filed.
09/16/2013Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice in support of neither party filed.
09/16/2013Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed.
09/16/2013Brief amici curiae of Eugene Volokh, et al., filed.
09/16/2013Brief amici curiae of National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, et al. filed.
09/16/2013Brief amici curiae of Bioethics Defense Fund, et al., filed.
09/16/2013Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed.
09/16/2013Brief amicus curiae of 40 Days for Life filed.
09/16/2013Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.
11/04/2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, January 15, 2014.
11/05/2013The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is further extended to and including November 15, 2013.
11/05/2013CIRCULATED
11/15/2013Brief of respondents Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/21/2013Record from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. Also record received from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit. (1 Box)
11/21/2013Brief amici curiae of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Federation of America filed. (Distributed)
11/21/2013Brief amici curiae of National Abortion Federation & 31 Other Organizations filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of City and County of San Francisco, California, and Seventeen Other Municipalities filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of Victim Rights Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of New York, et al. filed.
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of Anti-Defamation League, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of Civil Rights Organizations filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities, et al. filed.
11/22/2013Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. (Distributed)
11/27/2013Application (13A543) to extend the time to file a reply brief on the merits from December 16, 2013 to December 20, 2013, submitted to Justice Breyer.
11/27/2013Application (13A543) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until December 20, 2013.
12/09/2013Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
12/20/2013Reply of petitioners Eleanor McCullen, et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/15/2014Argued. For petitioners: Mark L. Rienzi, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jennifer Grace Miller, Assistant Attorney General, Boston, Mass.; and Ian H. Gershengorn, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
01/16/2014Letter from counsel for the petitioners filed. Distributed
06/26/2014Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Kennedy and Thomas, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
07/28/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED.
07/28/2014Record returned for U.S.C.A. for First Circuit.

Issue: (1) Whether the First Circuit erred in upholding Massachusetts”s selective exclusion law ” which makes it a crime for speakers other than clinic “employees or agents . . . acting within the scope of their employment” to “enter or remain on a public way or sidewalk” within thirty-five feet of an entrance, exit, or driveway of “a reproductive health care facility” ” under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, on its face and as applied to petitioners; (2) whether, if”Hill v. Colorado permits enforcement of this law,”Hill“should be limited or overruled.