Matal v. Tam
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
15-1293 | Jan 18, 2017 | Apr 25, 2025 | 8-0 | Alito | OT 2016 |
Holding: The disparagement clause of the Lanham Act violates the First Amendment's free speech clause.
Judgment: Affirmed, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on April 25, 2025. Justice Alito announced the judgment of the Supreme Court and delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court with respect to Parts I, II and III-A, in which all the justices joined except that Justice Thomas did not join Part II; Justice Alito also delivered an opinion with respect to Parts III-B, III-C and IV, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Breyer joined. Justice Kennedy filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan joined. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Symposium: Most important free speech case in many years (Hugh Hansen, June 22, 2017)
- Opinion analysis: Justices hold ban on disparaging trademarks violates Constitution (Amy Howe, June 20, 2017)
- Symposium: The cacophony of trademarks is not government speech (Irina Manta, June 20, 2017)
- Symposium: Increasing First Amendment scrutiny of trademark law after Matal v. Tam (Lisa Ramsey, June 20, 2017)
- Symposium: The First Amendment silences trademark (Ned Snow, June 20, 2017)
- Symposium: Free speech comes to trademark law (Christine Farley, June 20, 2017)
- Symposium: The Constitution prohibits governments happy-talk requirement for trademark registration (Caleb Trotter, June 19, 2017)
- A "view" from the courtroom: A clash of laws (Mark Walsh, June 19, 2017)
- Argument analysis: Justices skeptical of federal bar on disparaging trademarks (Amy Howe, January 19, 2017)
- Symposium: (Dont) always look on the bright side (Megan Carpenter, December 21, 2016)
- Symposium: A free speech argument against registering disparaging trademarks (Cecelia Chang and Daniel Kornstein, December 21, 2016)
- Symposium: Market failure (Robert Chang, December 20, 2016)
- Symposium: Slanted in favor of speech Why mere offense is not enough (Dwayne Sam and Megan Brown, December 20, 2016)
- Symposium: Niggling bureaucrats shouldnt be telling us whats disparaging (Ilya Shapiro, December 19, 2016)
- Symposium: Disparagement, trademark law and the First Amendment (Rebecca Tushnet, December 19, 2016)
- Introduction: Trademark law and the Constitution (Amy Howe, December 16, 2016)
- Justices add eight new cases to docket for upcoming term (Amy Howe, September 29, 2016)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/09/2016 | Application (15A925) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 21, 2016 to April 20, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
03/10/2016 | Application (15A925) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 20, 2016. |
04/20/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2016) |
05/10/2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 20, 2016. |
06/20/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Pro-Football, Inc. |
06/20/2016 | Brief of respondent Simon Shiao Tam filed. |
07/06/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
07/12/2016 | Reply of petitioner Michelle K. Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office filed. (Distributed) |
09/29/2016 | Petition GRANTED. |
09/30/2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent. |
11/09/2016 | Joint appendix filed. |
11/09/2016 | Brief of petitioner Michelle K. Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office filed. |
11/14/2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the petitioner. |
11/15/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Amanda Blackhorse, et al. filed. |
11/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of the American Bar Association, in support of neither party filed. |
11/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc., in support of neither party filed. |
11/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Native American Organizations filed. |
11/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. |
11/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Asian Americans Advancing Justice, et al., in support of neither party filed. |
11/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, et al. filed. |
11/18/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association, in support of neither party filed. |
11/21/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Certain Members of Congress, in support of neither party filed. |
11/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Knowledge, in support of neither party filed. |
11/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association, in support of neither party filed. |
12/05/2016 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, January 18, 2017. |
12/07/2016 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit. |
12/07/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed. |
12/09/2016 | Brief of respondent Simon Shiao Tam filed. (Distributed) |
12/13/2016 | CIRCULATED. |
12/13/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed) |
12/14/2016 | Record received from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is electronic along with instructions for access. Part of this record is located on PACER. |
12/14/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Professors filed. (Distributed) |
12/15/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Professors Edward Lee and Jake Linford filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Pro-Football, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Justice and Freedom Fund filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of San Francisco Dykes on Bikes Women's Motorcycle Contingent, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of The Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of The American Jewish Committee filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Rutherford Institute and Consumer's Research filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of International Trademark Association filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor Hugh C. Hansen filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Law Professors Gregory Dolin, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Erik Brunetti filed. (Distributed) |
12/16/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of First Amendment Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed) |
01/09/2017 | Reply of petitioner Michelle K. Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office filed. (Distributed) |
01/18/2017 | Argued. For petitioner: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: John C. Connell, Haddonfield, N. J. |
06/19/2017 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, and III-A, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined except for Part II, and an opinion with respect to Parts III-B, III-C, and IV, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas and Breyer, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
07/21/2017 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |