Skip to content

Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-720 9th Cir. Mar 31, 2015 Jun 22, 2015 6-3 Kagan OT 2014

Holding: The Court declined to overrule its 1964 decision in Brulotte v. Thys Co., holding that a patent holder cannot charge royalties for the use of his invention after its patent term has expired.

Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 22, 2015. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas joined.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/23/2013Application (13A304) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 14, 2013 to December 13, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
09/27/2013Application (13A304) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until December 13, 2013.
12/13/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2014)
01/13/2014Waiver of right of respondent Marvel Enterprises, Inc. to respond filed.
01/15/2014Brief amici curiae of Center for Intellectual Property Research of the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, et al. filed.
01/22/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014.
01/23/2014Response Requested . (Due February 24, 2014)
02/12/2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 26, 2014.
02/18/2014Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 27, 2014.
02/24/2014Brief amici curiae of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, et al. filed.
02/24/2014Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago filed.
03/12/2014Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 23, 2014.
04/23/2014Brief of respondent Marvel Enterprises, Inc. in opposition filed.
05/12/2014Reply of petitioners Stephen Kimble, et al. filed.
05/13/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 29, 2014.
06/02/2014The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
10/30/2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
11/18/2014Supplemental brief of petitioners Stephen Kimble, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/19/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2014.
12/08/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2014.
12/12/2014Petition GRANTED.
01/20/2015The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 28, 2015.
01/26/2015Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
01/28/2015Brief of petitioners Stephen Kimble, et al. filed.
02/02/2015SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, March 31, 2015
02/03/2015Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
02/03/2015Brief amicus curiae of Association of the Bar of the City of New York in support of neither party filed.
02/03/2015Record from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
02/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
02/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of Licensing Executives Society (U.S.A. and Canada), Inc. in support of neither party filed.
02/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of University of Massachusetts Biologic Laboratories filed.
02/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of BioTime, Inc. filed.
02/04/2015Brief amici curiae of Professor Robin Feldman, et al. in support of neither party filed.
02/04/2015Brief amici curiae of the Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed.
02/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.
02/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association ("NYIPLA") filed.
02/04/2015Brief amici curiae of Center for Intellectual Property Research of the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, et al. filed.
02/04/2015Brief amici curiae of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, et al. filed.
02/12/2015CIRCULATED
02/27/2015Brief of respondent Marvel Enterprises, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
03/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of Nautilus, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
03/04/2015Brief amicus curiae of Public Knowledge filed. (Distributed)
03/06/2015Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
03/06/2015Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
03/06/2015Proposal to lodge copies of two letters from counsel for petitioners.
03/06/2015Brief amicus curiae of William Mitchell College of Law Intellectual Property Institute filed. (Distributed)
03/06/2015Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)
03/09/2015Letter from counsel for respondent opposing petitioner's lodging proposal.
03/20/2015Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
03/24/2015Reply of petitioners Stephen Kimble, et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/31/2015Argued. For petitioners: Roman Melnik, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondent: Thomas G. Saunders, Washington, D. C.; and Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
06/22/2015Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, J., joined.
07/24/2015JUDGMENT ISSUED.