Johnson & Johnson v. Ingham
Petition for certiorari denied on January 6, 2021
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-1223 | Mo. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2020 |
Issue: (1) Whether a court must assess if consolidating multiple plaintiffs for a single trial violates due process, or whether it can presume that jury instructions always cure both jury confusion and prejudice to the defendant; (2) whether a punitive-damages award violates due process when it far exceeds a substantial compensatory-damages award, and whether the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages for jointly and severally liable defendants is calculated by assuming that each defendant will pay the entire compensatory award; and (3) whether the "arise out of or relate to" requirement for specific personal jurisdiction can be met by merely showing a "link" in the chain of causation, as the Court of Appeals of Missouri held, or whether a heightened showing of relatedness is required, as the Ford Motor Company in Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court has argued.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Justices to tackle copyright dispute next term (Amy Howe, June 1, 2021)
- Defamation claims against churches and American Samoas Deeds of Cession (Andrew Hamm, March 26, 2021)