Hutchings v. Ross
Petition for certiorari denied on November 9, 2020
Issue: Whether Rule 10(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a habeas petitioner to rely on a state court order appended to, but never mentioned in, his original federal habeas petition to supply the core operative facts necessary to satisfy the relation-back standard set forth in Mayle v. Felix.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week: Atlantic Ocean canyons, Utah wilderness roads and more (Andrew Hamm, August 20, 2020)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 07/23/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2020) |
| 08/20/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 27, 2020 to October 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 08/20/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 9, 2020. |
| 10/06/2020 | Brief of respondent Ronald Ross in opposition filed. |
| 10/06/2020 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Ronald Ross. |
| 10/20/2020 | Reply of petitioners Charles Daniels, Director, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 10/21/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020. |
| 11/09/2020 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
| 11/09/2020 | Petition DENIED. |