Skip to content

Hern”ndez v. Mesa

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-118 Feb 21, 2017 Apr 26, 2025 n/a Per Curiam OT 2016

Holding: (1) A Bivens remedy is not available when there are "special factors counselling hesitation in the absence of affirmative action by Congress," and the court recently clarified in Ziglar v. Abbasi what constitutes a special factor counselling hesitation; the court of appeals should consider how the reasoning and analysis in Ziglar bear on the question whether the parents of a victim shot by a U.S. Border Patrol agent may recover damages for his death; (2) It would be imprudent for the Supreme Court to decide Jesus Hernandez"s Fourth Amendment claim when, in light of the intervening guidance provided in Abbasi, doing so may be unnecessary to resolve this particular case; and (3) with respect to Hernandez"s Fifth Amendment claim, because it is undisputed that the victim's nationality and the extent of his ties to the United States were unknown to the agent at the time of the shooting, the en banc court of appeals erred in granting qualified immunity based on those facts.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on April 26, 2025. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/23/2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2015)
08/25/2015Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 25, 2015.
08/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Government of the United Mexican States filed.
08/26/2015Brief amici curiae of Amnesty International USA, et al. filed.
08/26/2015Brief amici curiae of Paso del Norte Civil Rights Project, et al. filed.
08/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Dean Erwin Chemerinsky filed.
09/25/2015Brief of respondent Jesus Mesa, Jr. in opposition filed.
10/14/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 30, 2015.
10/15/2015Reply of petitioners Jesus C. Hernandez, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/02/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 6, 2015.
11/09/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 13, 2015.
11/16/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 24, 2015.
11/30/2015The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
01/17/2016CIRCULATED.
02/29/2016Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.
03/16/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 1, 2016.
03/18/2016Supplemental brief of petitioners Jesus C. Hernandez, et al. filed. (Distributed)
06/06/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 9, 2016.
06/13/2016Rescheduled.
09/21/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 7, 2016.
10/11/2016Petition GRANTED. In addition to the questions presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether the claim in this case may be asserted under Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971).
11/09/2016Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the federal respondents.
11/14/2016Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Jesus C. Hernandez, et al.
11/15/2016Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party from counsel for petitioners.
11/22/2016The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 2, 2016.
11/22/2016The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including January 9, 2017.
11/28/2016Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
12/01/2016Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party from counsel for respondent Jesus Mesa, Jr.
12/02/2016Brief of petitioners Jesus C. Hernandez, et al. filed.
12/08/2016Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars filed.
12/09/2016Brief amicus curiae of Government of the United Mexican States filed.
12/09/2016Brief amicus curiae of Professor Gregory C. Sisk in support of neither party filed.
12/09/2016Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Professors James E. Pfander, Carlos M. Vazquez, and Anya Bernstein filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of The American Immigration Council, et al. filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Ten Law Professors filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Former Officials of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Border Scholars filed.
12/09/2016Brief amicus curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc. filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Legal Historians filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Border Action Network, et al. filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Amnesty International USA, et al. filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Former Police Chiefs filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of Mexican Jurists, Practitioners, and Scholars filed.
12/09/2016Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed.
12/22/2016SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, February 21, 2017.
12/30/2016Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.
01/09/2017Brief of Federal Respondents filed.
01/09/2017Brief of respondent Jesus Mesa, Jr. filed.
01/13/2017Motion for divided argument filed by Federal Respondents.
01/17/2017CIRCULATED.
01/17/2017Brief amicus curiae of APA Watch filed. (Distributed)
01/17/2017Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)
01/23/2017Motion for divided argument filed by Federal Respondents GRANTED.
02/01/2017Record received from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on PACER.
02/08/2017Reply of petitioners Jesus C. Hernandez, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/21/2017Argued. For petitioners: Robert C. Hilliard, Corpus Christi, Tex. For respondent Jesus Mesa, Jr.: Randolph J. Ortega, El Paso, Tex. For federal respondents: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
06/26/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2017.
06/26/2017Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Justice Thomas, dissenting. Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Opinion per curiam.
07/28/2017JUDGMENT ISSUED.