Skip to content

Habelt v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2024

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23-1134 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2024

Issue: Whether a named plaintiff who initiated a suit from which he was never dismissed or removed, who retains a financial stake in the litigation"s outcome, and who could be precluded from pursuing further redress has standing to appeal.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
02/23/2024Application (23A791) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 5, 2024 to April 4, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
02/27/2024Application (23A791) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 4, 2024.
03/25/2024Application (23A791) to extend further the time from April 4, 2024 to April 16, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
04/01/2024Application (23A791) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 16, 2024.
04/16/2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024)
05/20/2024Waiver of right of respondent iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
05/28/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
06/04/2024Response Requested. (Due July 5, 2024)
06/14/2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2024 to August 2, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
06/17/2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 2, 2024.
08/02/2024Brief of respondents iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
08/16/2024Reply of petitioner Mark Habelt filed.
08/21/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
10/07/2024Petition DENIED.