George v. House of Hope Recovery
Petition for certiorari denied on June 13, 2022
Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 permits a court of appeals to dismiss an appeal because the appellant did not serve the notice of appeal.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- The federal ban on bump stocks and the requirements of appellate service (Andrew Hamm, March 26, 2022)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 02/28/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 4, 2022) |
| 03/29/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 4, 2022 to May 4, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 03/30/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 4, 2022. |
| 04/04/2022 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law School Clinics. |
| 04/04/2022 | Brief of respondents Bridges to Change, Inc. and Washington County Department of Housing Services in opposition filed. |
| 05/04/2022 | Brief of respondents House of Hope Recovery and Patricia Barcroft in opposition filed. |
| 05/23/2022 | Reply of petitioner Constance George filed. (Distributed) |
| 05/24/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022. |
| 06/13/2022 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law School Clinics GRANTED. |
| 06/13/2022 | Petition DENIED. |