Skip to content

Garland v. Gonzalez

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-322 9th Cir. Jan 11, 2022 Jun 13, 2022 6-3 Alito OT 2021

Holding: 8 U.S.C. " 1252(f)(1) " which generally strips lower courts of "jurisdiction or authority" to "enjoin or restrain the operation of" certain provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act " deprived the district courts of jurisdiction in these cases to entertain respondents" requests for class-wide injunctive relief.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 13, 2022. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Kagan joined, and in which Justice Breyer joined as to Parts II-A-2, II-B-2, and III.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/04/2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
09/22/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2020 to December 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
09/24/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2020.
10/13/2020Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.
12/08/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2020 to January 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
12/10/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; time is extended to and including December 16, 2020.
12/16/2020Brief of respondents Esteban A. Gonzalez, et al. in opposition filed.
12/21/2020Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.
12/23/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
07/01/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.
08/23/2021Petition GRANTED. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether, under 8 U. S. C. " 1252(f)(1), the courts below had jurisdiction to grant classwide injunctive relief.
09/28/2021Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
10/01/2021Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 14, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 22, 2021.
10/06/2021Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al.
10/14/2021Brief of petitioners Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. filed.
10/18/2021Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.
10/21/2021Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.
11/17/2021ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, January 11, 2022.
11/17/2021Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
11/17/2021the record from the 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
11/22/2021Brief of respondents Esteban A. Gonzalez, et al. filed.
11/24/2021Brief amici curiae of Asian-Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, et al. filed (also in 19-896). VIDED.
11/29/2021Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed.
11/29/2021Brief amici curiae of Former Immigration Judges and Board of Immigration Appeals Members filed (also in 19-896). VIDED.
11/29/2021Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.
11/29/2021Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed (also in 19-896). VIDED.
12/08/2021CIRCULATED
12/22/2021Reply of petitioners Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/11/2022Argued. For petitioners: Curtis E. Gannon, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Matthew H. Adams, Seattle, Wash.
06/13/2022Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-322_new_986b.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Kagan, J., joined, and in which Breyer, J., joined as to Parts II"A"2, II"B"2, and III.
07/15/2022JUDGMENT ISSUED