Skip to content

Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-481 Apr 22, 2019 Jun 24, 2019 6-3 Gorsuch OT 2018

Holding: Where commercial or financial information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner and provided to the government under an assurance of privacy, the information is "confidential" within the meaning of 5 U. S. C. "552(b)(4), the Freedom of Information Act"s Exemption 4.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 24, 2019. Justice Breyer filed and opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor joined.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/07/2018Application (18A146) to recall and stay mandate pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
08/09/2018UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicant, IT IS ORDERED that the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, case No. 17-1346, is hereby recalled and stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Thursday, August 16, 2018, by 4 p.m. The reply, if any, is to be filed by 4 p.m., Tuesday, August 21, 2018.
08/16/2018Response to application from respondent Argus Leader Media, D/B/A Argus Leader filed.
08/21/2018Reply of applicant Food Marketing Institute filed.
08/29/2018Application (18A146) referred to the Court.
08/29/2018Application (18A146) granted by the Court. The application to recall and stay the mandate, presented to Justice Gorsuch and by him referred to the Court, is granted, and the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in case No. 17-1346 is recalled and stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would deny the application.
10/11/2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2018)
10/25/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2018 to December 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
10/29/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2018.
11/14/2018Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
11/14/2018Brief amici curiae of Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, et al. filed.
11/14/2018Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
11/14/2018Brief amici curiae of National Association of Convenience Stores, et al. filed.
11/20/2018Consent to change of Respondent's counsel of record of Argus Leader Media, d/b/a Argus Leader not accepted for filing. (November 27, 2018 -- Document not of the type that is to be filed electronically)
12/14/2018Brief of respondent Argus Leader Media, d/b/a Argus Leader in opposition filed.
12/24/2018Reply of petitioner Food Marketing Institute filed.
12/26/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
01/11/2019Petition GRANTED.
01/30/2019Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Argus Leader Media, d/b/a Argus Leader.
01/31/2019Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Food Marketing Institute.
02/11/2019SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 22, 2019
02/15/2019Brief of petitioner Food Marketing Institute filed.
02/15/2019Joint appendix filed (2 vols).
02/21/2019Brief amici curiae of National Association of Convenience Stores, et al. filed.
02/22/2019Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
02/22/2019Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
02/22/2019Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
02/22/2019Brief amici curiae of Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, et al. filed.
03/18/2019Brief of respondent Argus Leader Media, d/b/a Argus Leader filed. (Distributed)
03/20/2019CIRCULATED
03/21/2019Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.
03/22/2019Brief amici curiae of Cause of Action Institute, et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amicus curiae of New Hampshire Right to Life filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
03/25/2019Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amici curiae of Public Citizen, Center for Science in the Public Interest, Collaboration for Research Integrity filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amici curiae of Freedom of Information Act and First Amendment Scholars filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press & 36 Media Organizations filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amici curiae of Detention Watch Network, Human Rights Defense Center and Prison Policy Initiative filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Affidavit of Service of BioScience Advisors, Inc. not accepted for filing. (Corrected version submitted).
03/25/2019Corrected Affidavit of Service filed with respect to amicus curiae brief of BioScience Advisors, Inc. (March29, 2019).
03/25/2019Brief amicus curiae of BioScience Advisors, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amici curiae of AI Now Institute at New York University, et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amicus curiae of American Small Business League filed. (To be Reprinted) (Distributed)
03/25/2019Brief amicus curiae of American Small Business League filed. (April 16, 2019) (Distributed)
03/27/2019Record received from the U.S.D.C. Dist. of South Dakota Southern Division. (1 Box).
04/01/2019Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
04/05/2019Reply of petitioner Food Marketing Institute filed. (Distributed)
04/22/2019Argued. For petitioner: Evan A. Young, Austin, Tex.; and Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondent: Robert M. Loeb, Washington, D. C.
06/24/2019Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined.
07/26/2019JUDGMENT ISSUED.