Skip to content

Florida v. Jardines

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-564 Fla. S. Ct. Oct 31, 2012 Mar 26, 2013 5-4 Scalia OT 2012

Holding: A dog sniff at the front door of a house where the police suspected drugs were being grown constitutes a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment.

Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on March 26, 2013. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor joined. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Breyer joined.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/26/2011Application (11A348) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 5, 2011 to October 27, 2011, submitted to Justice Thomas.
10/05/2011Application (11A348) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 27, 2011.
10/26/2011Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 5, 2011)
10/26/2011Appendix of Florida filed.
12/02/2011Brief of respondent Joelis Jardines in opposition filed.
12/02/2011Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent.
12/05/2011Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.
12/14/2011DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2012.
12/15/2011Reply of petitioner Florida filed. (Distributed)
01/06/2012Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
01/06/2012Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
01/23/2012Brief amicus curiae of Wayne County, Michigan filed.
02/17/2012The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including March 22, 2012.
03/21/2012The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including April 26, 2012.
04/26/2012Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
04/26/2012Brief of petitioner Florida filed.
04/27/2012Brief amici curiae of National Police Canine Association and Police K-9 Magazine filed.
05/03/2012Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.
05/03/2012Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.
05/11/2012The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 25, 2012.
06/25/2012Brief of respondent Joelis Jardines filed.
07/02/2012Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
07/02/2012Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
07/02/2012Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.
07/02/2012Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.
07/02/2012Brief amicus curiae of Rutherford Institute filed.
07/16/2012Application (12A54) to extend the time to file a reply brief on the merits from July 25, 2012 to August 9, 2012, submitted to Justice Thomas.
07/18/2012Application (12A54) denied by Justice Thomas.
07/23/2012Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
07/23/2012SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, October 31, 2012
07/25/2012Reply of petitioner Florida filed. (Distributed)
08/02/2012CIRCULATED
08/22/2012Record received from Supreme Court of Florida. (1box)
10/31/2012Argued. For petitioner: Gregory G. Garre, Washington, D. C.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, Miami, Fla.
03/26/2013Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Thomas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy and Breyer, JJ., joined.
04/29/2013MANDATE ISSUED.
06/03/2013Record returned to Supreme Court of Florida.

Holding: A dog sniff at the front door of a house where the police suspected drugs were being grown constitutes a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment.

 

Judgment:”Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on March 26, 2013. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor joined. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Breyer joined.