Skip to content

Farrar v. Williams

Petition for certiorari denied on October 5, 2020

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-953 10th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2020

Issue: Whether the due process clause is violated when the prosecution relies on material, perjured testimony to secure a conviction but did not know the testimony was perjured until after the trial, as six courts have held, or whether the prosecution"s contemporaneous knowledge of the perjured testimony is required, as eight courts have held.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/13/2019Application (19A587) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 27, 2019 to January 26, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
11/26/2019Application (19A587) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 27, 2020.
01/27/2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)
02/26/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
03/02/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 1, 2020.
04/22/2020Waiver of right of respondent Dean Williams, et al. to respond filed.
04/28/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
05/04/2020Response Requested. (Due June 3, 2020)
06/03/2020Brief of respondents Dean Williams, et al. in opposition filed.
06/17/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
06/17/2020Reply of petitioner Charles Farrar filed. (Distributed)
10/05/2020Petition DENIED.