Skip to content

Elhady v. Bradley

Petition for certiorari denied on October 11, 2022

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-1492 6th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2022

Issue: (1) Whether, in an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity, a court of appeals always has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to decide whether a remedy exists under Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents for the claim against which the appellant asserts qualified immunity; and (2) whether Bivens claims are categorically precluded at the border, even when the plaintiff is a U.S. citizen who challenges mistreatment on U.S. soil by federal law-enforcement officers performing traditional law-enforcement duties.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/13/2022Application (21A607) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 25, 2022 to May 25, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
04/14/2022Application (21A607) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until May 25, 2022.
05/25/2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 27, 2022)
06/07/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 27, 2022 to July 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
06/09/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 27, 2022.
07/12/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 27, 2022 to August 26, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
07/14/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 26, 2022.
08/26/2022Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
09/13/2022Reply of petitioner Anas Elhady filed. (Distributed)
09/14/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
10/11/2022Petition DENIED.