El-Nahal v. Yassky
Petition for certiorari denied on May 30, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether an individual whose location was tracked by a GPS device placed in his vehicle has Fourth Amendment standing to challenge that tracking if he was not in possession of the vehicle when the GPS tracking device was installed; and (2) whether there is a Fourth Amendment right against the government searching an individual's tracking information to investigate criminal activity without a warrant.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Kate Howard, March 4, 2017)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 12/22/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2017) |
| 01/10/2017 | Waiver of right of respondent David Yassky, et al. to respond filed. |
| 01/25/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2017. |
| 02/02/2017 | Response Requested . (Due March 6, 2017) |
| 02/27/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 20, 2017. |
| 04/20/2017 | Brief of respondents David Yassky, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 05/02/2017 | Reply of petitioner Hassan El-Nahal filed. |
| 05/09/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017. |
| 05/30/2017 | Petition DENIED. |