Skip to content

DIRECTV, LLC v. Massachusetts

Petition for certiorari denied on November 2, 2015

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-1499 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2015

Issue: Whether the threshold requirement that two businesses be "similarly situated" for Commerce Clause purposes depends on whether they directly compete in the relevant market (which is how three circuits and three state supreme courts analyze the issue), or whether it instead encompasses a wide-ranging inquiry into the justifications for the law and operational differences (as four circuits and one state supreme court have held).

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/21/2015Application (14A1087) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 19, 2015 to June 18, 2015, submitted to Justice Breyer.
04/24/2015Application (14A1087) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until June 18, 2015.
06/18/2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 22, 2015)
06/24/2015Waiver of right of respondent Massachusetts Department of Revenue to respond filed.
07/08/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.
07/08/2015Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
07/21/2015Brief amici curiae of Forty-Seven Constitutional Law Professors filed. VIDED.
07/21/2015Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Wine Retailers filed. VIDED.
07/23/2015Response Requested . (Due August 24, 2015)
08/07/2015Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 23, 2015.
08/11/2015Letter of petitioner indicating material changes in the corporate disclosure statement of DIRECTV, Inc. filed.
09/23/2015Brief of respondent Massachusetts Department of Revenue in opposition filed.
10/06/2015Reply of petitioners DIRECTV, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
10/07/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 30, 2015.
11/02/2015Petition DENIED.