Skip to content

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1276 Nov 28, 2017 Feb 21, 2018 9-0 Ginsburg OT 2017

Holding: The anti-retaliation provision of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act does not extend to an individual who has not reported a violation of the securities laws to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on February 21, 2018. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Breyer joined. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Justices Alito and Gorsuch joined.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/25/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 25, 2017)
05/03/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the Respondent.
05/08/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 30, 2017.
05/10/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.
05/24/2017Brief amici curiae of New England Legal Foundation, et al. filed. (Distributed)
05/25/2017Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)
05/25/2017Brief amicus curiae of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. (Distributed)
05/25/2017Brief amicus curiae of Lime Energy Services Company filed. (Distributed)
05/26/2017Letter of May 26, 2017, from counsel for petitioner waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 received.
05/30/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 15, 2017.
05/30/2017Brief of respondent Paul Somers in opposition filed. (Distributed)
06/02/2017Reply of petitioner Digital Realty Trust, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
06/19/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 22, 2017.
06/26/2017Petition GRANTED.
07/06/2017Consent the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.
07/12/2017The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 24, 2017.
07/12/2017The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 10, 2017.
07/12/2017Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
07/18/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent.
08/24/2017Brief of petitioner Digital Realty Trust, Inc. filed.
08/25/2017Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
08/25/2017Brief amici curiae of New England Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
08/31/2017Brief amicus curiae of The Center for Workplace Compliance filed.
08/31/2017Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
08/31/2017Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
08/31/2017Brief amici curiae of Lime Energy Services Company and Prestige Cruises International filed.
10/06/2017SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, November 28, 2017.
10/10/2017Brief of respondent Paul Somers filed.
10/11/2017Motion to argue pro hac vice filed by the Solicitor General.
10/12/2017CIRCULATED
10/17/2017Brief amici curiae of National Whistleblower Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
10/17/2017Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
10/17/2017Brief amicus curiae of Senator Charles Grassley filed. (Distributed)
10/17/2017Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
10/17/2017Brief amicus curiae of Ethical Systems, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
10/17/2017Brief amicus curiae of Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund filed. (Distributed)
10/18/2017Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
10/18/2017Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
11/06/2017Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
11/06/2017Motion to argue pro hac vice filed by the Solicitor General GRANTED.
11/09/2017Reply of petitioner Digital Realty Trust, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
11/28/2017Argued. For petitioner: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex.; and Christopher G. Michel, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Pro hac vice; for United States, as amicus curiae.)
02/21/2018Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Breyer, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Alito and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.
03/26/2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.