Skip to content

Davis v. United States

Petition for certiorari denied on February 21, 2023

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
22-5364 Not Argued Jun 16, 2011 N/A N/A OT 2010

Issue: Whether a criminal defense attorney provides prejudicially ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to initiate plea negotiations with the prosecutors where such negotiations would be likely to yield a substantially better outcome for the defendant than would going to trial or, instead, whether counsel"s plea-negotiation obligation arises only if the prosecutors first initiate plea negotiations and make a plea offer.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/08/2022Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2022)
09/12/2022Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
09/15/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
09/16/2022Response Requested. (Due October 17, 2022)
10/13/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 17, 2022 to November 16, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
10/14/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 16, 2022.
11/10/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2022 to December 8, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
11/14/2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 8, 2022.
12/08/2022Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
12/20/2022Reply of petitioner Quartavious Davis filed. (Distributed)
12/22/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
01/06/2023Rescheduled.
01/09/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
01/12/2023Rescheduled.
01/17/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
02/10/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
02/21/2023Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson, with whom Justice Sotomayor joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)