Skip to content

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-896 Fed. Cir. Mar 31, 2015 May 26, 2015 6-2 Kennedy OT 2014

Holding: A defendant"s belief regarding patent validity is not a defense to an induced infringement claim.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on May 26, 2015. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts joined. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
01/23/2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2014)
02/03/2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 31, 2014.
03/31/2014Brief of respondent Cisco Systems, Inc. in opposition filed.
05/06/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 22, 2014.
05/27/2014The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
10/16/2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED.
10/31/2014Supplemental brief of respondent Cisco Systems, Inc. filed. VIDED.
10/31/2014Reply of petitioner Commil USA, LLC filed. VIDED.
11/03/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 25, 2014.
12/01/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2014.
12/05/2014Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
01/20/2015Brief of petitioner Commil USA, LLC filed.
01/20/2015Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
01/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Gilead Sciences, Inc. filed.
01/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.
01/27/2015Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
01/27/2015Brief amicus curiae of AbbVie Inc. filed.
01/27/2015Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
01/27/2015Brief amicus curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed.
01/27/2015Brief amicus curiae of MUSC Foundation for Research Development filed.
01/27/2015Brief amicus curiae of Biotechnology Industry Organization filed.
02/02/2015SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, March 31, 2015
02/03/2015Record requested from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.
02/04/2015Record received from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
02/12/2015CIRCULATED
02/19/2015Brief of respondent Cisco Systems, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
02/20/2015Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
02/24/2015Brief amici curiae of Public Knowledge, et al. filed.
02/25/2015Brief amici curiae of Sixteen Intellectual Property Law Professors filed. (Distributed).
02/26/2015Brief amici curiae of EMC Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Computer & Communications Industry Association filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2015Brief amici curiae of DeLorme, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Generic Pharmaceutical Association filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Askeladden L.L.C. filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2015Brief amicus curiae of Professor Saurabh Vishnubhakat filed. (Distributed)
03/20/2015Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
03/20/2015Reply of petitioner Commil USA, LLC filed. (Distributed)
03/31/2015Argued. For petitioner: Mark S. Werbner, Dallas, Tex.; and Ginger D. Anders, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C.
05/26/2015Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to Parts II-B and III. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., joined. Breyer, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
06/29/2015JUDGMENT ISSUED.