Skip to content

City of Chicago, Illinois v. Fulton

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-357 7th Cir. Oct 13, 2020 Jan 14, 2021 8-0 Alito OT 2020

Holding: The mere retention of estate property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not violate 11 U.S.C. " 362(a)(3), which operates as a "stay" of "any act" to "exercise control" over the property of the estate.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on January 14, 2021. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/17/2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2019)
10/02/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 18, 2019 to November 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
10/03/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2019.
10/17/2019Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers' Association filed.
11/08/2019Brief of respondents Robbin L. Fulton, et al. in opposition filed.
11/25/2019Reply of petitioner City of Chicago filed.
11/26/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
12/18/2019Petition GRANTED.
02/03/2020Joint appendix filed.
02/03/2020Brief of petitioner City of Chicago filed.
02/07/2020Brief amici curiae of Professors Ralph Brubaker, et al. filed.
02/10/2020Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
02/10/2020Brief amici curiae of National Association of Counties, et al. filed.
02/21/2020SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 20, 2020.
02/26/2020Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit.
02/26/2020Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
02/27/2020The record from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit is available on PACER; sealed portions are electronically available with the Clerk.
03/04/2020Brief of respondents Robbin L. Fulton, et al. filed.
03/10/2020Brief amici curiae of Bankruptcy Law Professors filed.
03/10/2020Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Chapter Thirteen Trustees filed.
03/10/2020Brief amicus curiae of Geraci Law LLC filed.
03/11/2020Brief amici curiae of National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center, et al. filed.
03/11/2020Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees filed.
03/11/2020Brief amici curiae of Professors John A. E. Pottow and Jay Lawrence Westbrook filed.
03/11/2020Amicus brief of American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, Cato Institute, Fines and Fees Justice Center, Institute for Justice, R Street Institute, Rutherford Institute not accepted for filing. (March 19, 2020 - Corrected version submitted).
03/11/2020Amicus brief of American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, Cato Institute, Fines and Fees Justice Center, Institute for Justice, R Street Institute, Rutherford Institute not accepted for filing (Duplicate; corrected version submitted).
03/11/2020Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed. (March 18, 2020)
03/19/2020CIRCULATED
03/23/2020Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
03/31/2020Application (19A1029) of petitioner to extend the time to file a reply brief on the merits from April 3, 2020 to April 8, 2020, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
04/01/2020Application (19A1029) of petitioner granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file a reply brief on the merits until April 8, 2020.
04/03/2020ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED.
04/08/2020Reply of petitioner City of Chicago filed. (Distributed)
04/13/2020Argument to be rescheduled for the October Term 2020.
07/13/2020SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 13, 2020.
10/13/2020Argued. For petitioner: Craig Goldblatt, Washington, D. C.; and Colleen E. R. Sinzdak, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Eugene R. Wedoff, Oak Park, Ill.
01/14/2021Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-357_6k47.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Barrett, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion.
02/16/2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.