Skip to content

City of Hays, Kansas v. Vogt

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1495 Feb 20, 2018 May 29, 2018 n/a Per Curiam OT 2017

Issue: Whether the Fifth Amendment is violated when statements are used at a probable cause hearing but not at a criminal trial.

Judgment: The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted in a per curiam opinion on May 29, 2018. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/10/2017Application (16A996) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 30, 2017 to June 29, 2017, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
04/21/2017Application (16A996) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 29, 2017.
06/13/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 17, 2017)
06/29/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 16, 2017.
08/16/2017Brief of respondent Matthew Jack D. Vogt in opposition filed.
08/23/2017Reply of petitioner City of Hays, Kansas filed.
08/30/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.
09/28/2017Petition GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
10/02/2017Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner.
10/31/2017Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, City of Hays, Kansas
11/02/2017Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Matthew Jack D. Vogt.
11/06/2017Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
11/13/2017Brief of petitioner City of Hays, Kansas filed.
11/20/2017Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
11/20/2017Brief amicus curiae of State and Local Government Employers filed.
11/20/2017Brief amici curiae of The State of Kansas and 12 Other States filed.
11/20/2017Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed.
12/11/2017Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
12/13/2017Brief of respondent Matthew Jack D. Vogt filed.
12/20/2017SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, February 20, 2018
12/20/2017Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Procedure Scholars filed.
12/20/2017Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Government Employees and American Federation of Teachers filed.
12/20/2017Brief amicus curiae of National Fraternal Order of Police filed.
12/20/2017Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and American Civil Liberties Union filed.
01/05/2018CIRCULATED
01/08/2018Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
01/08/2018Reply of petitioner City of Hays, Kansas filed. (Distributed)
01/10/2018Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.
01/12/2018The entire record from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
02/01/2018The record received from the U.S.D.C. District of Kansas is electronic.
02/20/2018Argued. For petitioner: Toby J. Heytens, Charlottesville, Va.; and Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Kelsi B. Corkran, Washington, D. C.
05/29/2018Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Opinion per curiam.
07/02/2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.