Skip to content

Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1566 9th Cir. Jan 18, 2022 Apr 21, 2022 9-0 Kagan OT 2021

Holding: In a suit raising non-federal claims against a foreign state or instrumentality under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a court should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on April 21, 2022.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/06/2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 10, 2021)
05/14/2021Waiver of right of respondent Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation to respond filed.
05/18/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
05/24/2021Response Requested. (Due June 23, 2021)
05/24/2021Brief amici curiae of 14 Professors of Law filed.
06/02/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 23, 2021 to July 30, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
06/03/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 30, 2021.
07/29/2021Brief of respondent Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation in opposition filed.
08/17/2021Reply of petitioners David Cassirer, et al. filed. (Distributed)
08/18/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
09/30/2021Petition GRANTED.
10/14/2021Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
10/19/2021Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits denied.
10/21/2021Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, David Cassirer, et al.
10/21/2021Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
11/15/2021Brief of petitioners David Cassirer, et al filed.
11/15/2021Joint appendix filed (statement of cost received).
11/17/2021ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, January 18, 2022.
11/17/2021Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
11/17/2021The record from the 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
11/18/2021Brief amici curiae of The 1939 Society, et al. filed.
11/19/2021Brief amici curiae of B'nai B'rith International, et al. filed.
11/22/2021Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
11/22/2021Brief amici curiae of Professors of Law filed.
11/22/2021Brief amici curiae of Comunidad Jud"a de Madrid and Federaci"n de Comunidades Jud"as de Espa"a filed.
11/22/2021Brief amicus curiae of Mark B. Feldman filed.
12/14/2021CIRCULATED
12/15/2021Brief of respondent Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation filed. (Distributed)
12/20/2021Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.
01/06/2022The record received from the United States District Court Central District of California - 1 Box. Exhibits received has been electronically filed.
01/07/2022Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.
01/07/2022Reply of petitioners David Cassirer, et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/18/2022Argued. For petitioners: David Boies, Armonk, N. Y.; and Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Thaddeus J. Stauber, Los Angeles, Cal.
04/21/2022Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1566_l5gm.pdf'>opinion</a> for a unanimous Court.
05/23/2022Judgment Issued
01/13/2023Record returned to U.S.D.C.-Central District of California - 1 Box.