Skip to content

BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23-1259 2nd Cir. Mar 3, 2025 TBD TBD TBD OT 2024

Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)"s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/29/2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2024)
07/17/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
07/29/2024Response Requested. (Due August 28, 2024)
08/28/2024Brief of respondents Michal Honickman, et al. in opposition filed.
09/11/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
09/11/2024Reply of petitioner BLOM Bank SAL filed. (Distributed)
10/04/2024Petition GRANTED.
10/15/2024Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
10/18/2024Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 9, 2024. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 8, 2025.
11/22/2024SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 3, 2025.
11/27/2024Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
12/03/2024Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and available with the Clerk.
12/09/2024Brief of petitioner BLOM Bank SAL filed.
12/09/2024Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
01/08/2025Brief of respondents Michal Honickman, et al. filed.
01/13/2025CIRCULATED
01/15/2025Record received electronically from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and available with the Clerk (one DVD).
02/07/2025Reply of petitioner BLOM Bank SAL filed. (Distributed)
03/03/2025Argued. For petitioner: Michael H. McGinley, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Michael J. Radine, Hackensack, N. J.