Behr Dayton Thermal Products, LLC v. Martin
Petition for certiorari denied on March 18, 2019
Issue: Whether plaintiffs, having failed to demonstrate that common issues predominate over individual issues as to their cause of action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), may nevertheless obtain certification of issue classes for that cause of action under Rule 23(c)(4).
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Aurora Barnes, November 15, 2018)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 10/12/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2018) |
| 11/01/2018 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC, et al.. |
| 11/13/2018 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
| 11/13/2018 | Waiver of right of respondents Terry Martin, et al. to respond filed. |
| 11/20/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018. |
| 11/29/2018 | Response Requested. (Due January 2, 2019) |
| 12/11/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2019 to February 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/13/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 1, 2019. |
| 02/01/2019 | Brief of respondents Terry Martin, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 02/20/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019. |
| 02/20/2019 | Reply of petitioners Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 03/18/2019 | Petition DENIED. |