Becker v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Issue: (1) Whether a federal court may force a non-consenting, non-Indian plaintiff to exhaust his claims in tribal court when the defendant tribe has expressly consented by contract to federal or state court jurisdiction and waived both sovereign immunity and tribal exhaustion; and (2) whether a state court may adjudicate a contractual dispute between a tribe and a non-Indian when the tribe has provided specific contractual consent to state court jurisdiction; or instead, whether the Constitution or laws of the United States prohibit such exercises of state court jurisdiction unless the state has assumed general civil jurisdiction over tribal territory under Sections 1322 and 1326 of Title 25.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- International issues in criminal law: Extradition of El Chapo and extraterritoriality in Nigeria (Andrew Hamm, May 7, 2022)
- Capital defendant whose lawyer conceded guilt despite his objection seeks relief from Supreme Court (Andrew Hamm, April 29, 2022)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
04/06/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 11, 2022) |
04/27/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 11, 2022 to June 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
04/28/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 10, 2022. |
06/10/2022 | Brief of respondents Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al. in opposition filed. |
06/28/2022 | Reply of petitioner Lynn D. Becker filed. (Distributed) |
06/29/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
10/03/2022 | Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |