Skip to content

Babcock v. Kijakazi

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-480 6th Cir. Oct 13, 2021 Jan 13, 2022 8-1 Barrett OT 2021

Holding: Civil-service pension payments based on employment as a dual-status military technician are not payments based on "service as a member of a uniformed service" under 42 U.S.C. " 415(a)(7)(A)(III).

Judgment: Affirmed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Barrett on January 13, 2022. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/08/2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2020)
10/08/2020Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
10/16/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2020 to December 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
10/19/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 14, 2020.
12/03/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2020 to January 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
12/04/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 13, 2021.
01/13/2021Brief of respondent Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security in opposition filed.
01/27/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
01/27/2021Reply of petitioner David Babcock filed. (Distributed)
02/22/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
03/01/2021Petition GRANTED.
03/01/2021As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
03/12/2021Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
03/22/2021Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 20, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 26, 2021.
05/14/2021Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner David Babcock.
05/20/2021Brief of petitioner David Babcock filed.
05/27/2021Brief amici curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. filed.
06/07/2021Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
07/13/2021ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, October 13, 2021.
07/26/2021Brief of respondent Kijakazi, Acting Comm'r of SSA filed.
07/28/2021Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.
07/28/2021Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit has been electronically filed.
08/02/2021Motion of David Babcock for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (August 06, 2021)
08/03/2021CIRCULATED
08/05/2021Application (21A17) to extend the time to file the reply brief on the merits from August 25, 2021 to September 8, 2021, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
08/11/2021Application (21A17) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file the reply brief on the merits until September 8, 2021.
09/08/2021Reply of petitioner David Babcock filed. (Distributed)
10/13/2021Argued. For petitioner: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Nicole Reaves, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
10/14/2021Letter of the Solicitor General filed. (Distributed)
01/13/2022Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Barrett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
02/14/2022JUDGMENT ISSUED.