Skip to content

AT&T, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Petition for certiorari denied on November 5, 2018

Linked with:

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-499 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2018

Issue: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission has statutory authority to reclassify fixed and mobile broadband internet-access service as a "telecommunications service" subject to common-carrier regulation; and (2) whether the FCC has statutory authority to reclassify mobile broadband internet-access service as a "commercial mobile service" subject to common-carrier regulation.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/10/2017Application (17A54) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 30, 2017 to September 28, 2017, submitted to The Chief Justice.
07/20/2017Application (17A54) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 28, 2017.
09/28/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2017)
09/28/2017Appendix of AT&T Inc. filed. (Volumes I, II, & III)
10/11/2017Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, AT&T Inc.
10/12/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondents, United States Telecom Association, CenturyLink, Inc.VIDED
10/13/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondent-intervenors, Free Press, Open Technology Institute-New America and Public Knowledge. (VIDED)
10/13/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondent-intervenor, Cogent Communications, Inc.(VIDED)
10/14/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondent-intervenor, Center Democracy & Technology VIDED
10/18/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondent-intervenor, Akamai Technologies, Inc. VIDED
10/23/2017Waiver of right of respondent NCTA - The Internet and Television Association to respond filed.
10/24/2017Waiver of right of respondent United States Telecom Association, CenturyLink, Inc. to respond filed.
10/24/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondent-intervenor, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee VIDED
10/25/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 4, 2017, for all respondents.
10/25/2017Waiver of right of respondent CTIA - The Wireless Association to respond filed.
10/30/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondent, NCTA - The Internet and Television Association. VIDED
11/01/2017Blanket Consent filed by respondent-intervenors, COMPTEL (d/b/a INCOMPAS), et al. VIDED
11/02/2017Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.
11/02/2017Brief amici curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.
11/08/2017Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, CTIA - The Wireless Association.
11/22/2017Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 4, 2017 to January 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
11/27/2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 3, 2018, for all respondents.
12/18/2017Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2018 to February 2, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
12/19/2017Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 2, 2018, for all respondents.
01/19/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 2, 2018 to March 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
01/23/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 5, 2018, for all respondents.
03/02/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 5, 2018 to April 4, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
03/05/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 4, 2018, for all respondents.
03/30/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 4, 2018 to May 4, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
04/02/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 4, 2018 , for all respondents
04/27/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 4, 2018 to June 4, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
04/30/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 4, 2018, for all respondents.
05/30/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 15, 2018, for all respondents.
05/30/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 4, 2018 to August 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
08/02/2018Brief of Federal Respondents filed. VIDED.
08/07/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 15, 2018 to September 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
08/09/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 14, 2018, for all respondents.
09/14/2018Brief of respondent Free Press in opposition filed. VIDED.
09/14/2018Brief of respondents Public Knowledge, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.
10/03/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
10/29/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
11/05/2018Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch would grant the petition, vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and remand to that court with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). The Chief Justice and Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.