Skip to content

Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-298 Fed. Cir. Mar 31, 2014 Jun 19, 2014 9-0 Thomas OT 2013

Holding: Because Alice Corporation's patent claims involving (1) a method for exchanging financial obligations, (2) a computer system as a third-party intermediary, and (3) a computer-readable medium containing program code for performing the method of exchanging obligations are drawn to a patent-ineligible abstract idea under 35 U.S.C. ยง 101, they are not patent eligible under Section 101.

Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 19, 2014.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/18/2013Application (13A95) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 8, 2013 to September 6, 2013, submitted to The Chief Justice.
07/22/2013Application (13A95) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 6, 2013.
09/04/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 7, 2013)
09/09/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
09/11/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 6, 2013.
09/13/2013Letter of September 13, 2013, from counsel for respondents received.
09/13/2013Consent to filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for petitioner Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd..
10/04/2013Brief amicus curiae of Dale R. Cook filed.
10/04/2013Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed.
10/07/2013Brief amici curiae of Trading Technologies International, et al. filed.
10/07/2013Brief amicus curiae of Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH filed.
10/07/2013Brief amici curiae of Professor Lee Hollaar, and Peter K. Trzyna in support of neither party filed.
10/07/2013Brief amicus curiae of Gibbons Institute of Law, Science and Technology in support of neither party filed.
10/07/2013Brief amici curiae of Accenture Global Services, GmbH, et al. filed.
10/07/2013Brief amicus curiae of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.- USA filed.
10/07/2013Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago filed.
10/07/2013Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association filed.
10/07/2013Brief amici curiae of Students of Patent Law filed.
11/06/2013Brief of respondents CLS Bank International, et al. in opposition filed.
11/19/2013Reply of petitioner Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. filed.
11/20/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 6, 2013.
12/06/2013Petition GRANTED.
12/11/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
12/11/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
01/08/2014SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 31, 2014
01/14/2014Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Columbia. The record is electronic.
01/16/2014Record received from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit. 1 Box.
01/21/2014Joint appendix (3 volumes) filed. (Statement of costs filed)
01/21/2014Brief of petitioner Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. filed.
01/22/2014Brief amicus curiae of Retailers in support of neither party filed.
01/23/2014Brief amicus curiae of Dale R. Cook filed.
01/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of Paul R. Michel in support of neither party filed.
01/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property in support of neither party filed.
01/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of Professor Lee Hollaar, and Peter K. Trzyna in support of neither party filed.
01/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of Proove Biosciences, Inc. in support of neither party filed.
01/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
01/27/2014Brief amici curiae of James B. Lampert, and David A. Chavous in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of International Business Machines Corporation in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amici curiae of Trading Technologies International, Inc., et al. filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amici curiae of Professor Robin Feldman, and U.C. Hastings Institute for Innovation Law, in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of SHFL entertainment, Inc. in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Brian R. Galvin in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Conejo Valley Bar Association in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Margo Livesay Ph.D. in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of IEEE-USA in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Association of the Bar of the City of New York in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Advanced Biological Laboratories, SA filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Ronald M. Benrey in support of neither party filed.
01/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.
02/03/2014CIRCULATED.
02/11/2014Letter received from counsel for amicius curiae Ronald M. Benrey proposing a lodging of the book entitled "Understanding Digital Computers" (1964). Distributed.
02/20/2014Brief of respondents CLS Bank International, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/24/2014Brief amicus curiae of The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C. filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2014Brief amici curiae of Public Knowledge, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2014Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2014Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Liberties Union filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2014Brief amici curiae of Law, Business, and Economics Scholars filed. (Distributed)
02/26/2014Brief amicus curiae of Red Hat, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of Tony Dutra filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of BSA / The Software Alliance filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of RichRelevance, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of Software Freedom Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of Professors Peter S. Menell and Jeffrey A. Lefstin filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of Microsoft Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of Checkpoint Software, Inc., et al. filed.
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of Google Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of Computer & Communications Industry Association filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
02/27/2014Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed. (Distributed)
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of The Clearing House Association L.L.C., et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/19/2014Reply of petitioner Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. filed. (Distributed)
03/21/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
03/31/2014Argued. For petitioner: Carter G. Phillips, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Mark A. Perry, Washington, D. C.; and Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
06/19/2014Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ., joined.
07/21/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED
07/22/2014Record has been returned for U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.

Issue: Whether claims to computer-implemented inventions ” including claims to systems and machines, processes, and items of manufacture ” are directed to patent-eligible subject matter within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. ยง 101 as interpreted by this Court.