Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-9085 | 9th Cir. | Not Argued | Jul 1, 2014 | TBD | TBD | OT 2013 |
Issue: (1) Whether, in denying rehearing after deciding Johnson v. Williams, this Court meant to bar a deferential review on remand, or whether denial of rehearing simply reflected that disputes regarding the scope of this Court’s mandate were to be resolved on remand; and (2) whether the previous denial of certiorari as to the question of whether Ms. Williams could prevail under deferential review, or the subsequent denial of rehearing, constituted “certiorari granted” under 28 U.S.C. § 1254, where the Court’s opinion contained no discussion of a question outside a limited grant of certiorari.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded on July 1, 2014.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Mar 7 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2014) |
Mar 25 2014 | Waiver of right of respondent Deborah K. Johnson, Acting Warden to respond filed. |
Apr 3 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014. |
Apr 14 2014 | Response Requested . (Due May 14, 2014) |
May 14 2014 | Brief of respondent Deborah K. Johnson, Acting Warden in opposition filed. |
May 21 2014 | Reply of petitioner Tara Sheneva Williams filed. |
May 28 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014. |
Jun 16 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014. |
Jun 23 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2014. |
Jun 30 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 30, 2014. |
Jul 1 2014 | Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED For further consideration of petitioners Sixth Amendment claim under the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. §2254(d). |
Aug 4 2014 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |